Table of Contents
WASHINGTON — New research from Avalere finds that the amount of prescription opioids sold across the US declined by 11% in 2017 compared to 2016. States that passed laws setting limits on opioid prescriptions in 2016 experienced steeper declines in opioids sold than the national average, with decreases in these states ranging from 13% to 25%. Maine, which passed such a law in 2016, had the largest decline at nearly 25%.
“States’ efforts to tackle the opioid crisis have been ongoing for several years with various levels of success,” said Kelly Brantley, vice president at Avalere. “Limiting the supply of opioids, such as through fill limits, is gaining traction as part of a broader set of strategies being tested by states as they continue to confront the opioid crisis.”
Opioid fill limits set restrictions on the quantity of opioids that can be prescribed by a physician to a given patient over a specific period of time. By the end of 2016, 7 states—Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont—passed laws limiting opioid prescriptions to a 3- to 14-day supply or limiting the morphine milligram equivalent (MME) amount of medication that can be prescribed. As of today, 22 states have enacted legislation to limit opioid prescribing amounts (Figure 1).
Figure 1. States with Laws Limiting Opioid Prescribing Amounts
In 2017, the amount of opioids sold in the U.S. declined by 11.0% from 2016. Maine, which enacted a law in 2016 to limit the MME that could be prescribed, had the greatest decline in the U.S. at 24.8%. Avalere researchers found that all states but Idaho had opioid distribution levels decrease. In Idaho, opioid distribution amounts increased 59.7%. A closer look at the data shows that the amount of oxycodone sold in Idaho rose nearly three times in 2017 when compared to 2016.
“The U.S. saw a decline in opioid sales in 2017, but the epidemic continues to devastate many parts of the country,” said Clara Soh, director at Avalere. “As Congress considers sweeping legislative initiatives to address this epidemic, state governments are continuing to advance solutions within their own states.”
